Ownership, Rich Kids, & Word Counts

Posted on Updated on

Today, let’s discuss Lucy Leroux’s novelette Confiscating Charlie.

Confiscating Charlie

For those of you wondering what the fuck a novelette is, the term seems to refer to a work that is longer than a short story yet shorter than a novella. Generally, the length meeting this definition seems to be more than 7,500 words, but not exceeding 17,500 words.


With our vocabulary lesson out of the way, we can get down to the real issues: Shit that bothered me while reading this story.

What do you mean, it's not all about me?
What do you mean, it’s not all about me?

In many ways, Confiscating Charlie could be regarded as a fairy tale. Poor girl raised by her cruel, uncaring sister, is saved by a rich boy who awakens her sexual passion while providing her with comfortable living arrangements. Another way of viewing this scenario is that an older man with a Master’s degree under his belt seduced a young, inexperienced girl into becoming his mistress.

Knight in shining armor or dick with a sword?
Knight in shining armor or dick with a sword?

The sex that Charlie and Alex have in this book is sexy, so as far as erotica goes, it’s not that I don’t think this story fits the bill. In fact, in general, I have personally always been slightly enchanted by the idea of an older, more experienced man seducing a younger girl (although not, like, not even legally adult young, which this book and most erotica tastefully avoid by making the girl old enough to avoid statutory rape). What really bothered me in Confiscating Charlie was the concept of ownership.

In the end, Charlie’s really just a songbird in a cage.

When Alex takes Charlie’s virginity, which both of them are really into, he gets possessive. Although he’s willing to put on a condom for Charlie’s first time, he also informs her that she needs to go on birth control soon, for some supposedly romantic reason, but really just pointing out that he’s an asshole who thinks he can dictate what a woman does with her body before he’s dating her or has even had sex with her. A star-eyed Charlie tells him that she’s already on birth control, and he tosses the condom away, adding litterbug to his list of offenses (not to mention potentially putting Charlie at risk for STDs).

No littering! Don't you see the sign?
No littering! Don’t you see the sign?

Then, after getting her all hot and bothered, Alex makes Charlie say that she “belongs” to him, out loud, before he will penetrate her. This requirement is being made to a virgin who has never even been kissed before, and who does not seem to get affection from her family or anyone else, and whom Alex has known for less than a month.


Of course she does it. I mean, the novelette is realistic, in that 19-year-old girls tend to be idiots, particularly when they think they’re in love. (I was no exception.) Yet something the novelette does not touch on is the fact that Alex’s demand is not okay. A person does not belong to another person, whether we’re talking about slaves or romantic partners. A person belongs to him- or herself. It’s not romantic to let someone else treat you like livestock, just some possession that they own and to whom they can do whatever they wish. A woman is not a cow, and it is not okay to say otherwise.

This is a cow, NOT a woman. One can be property, the other cannot.
This is a cow, NOT a woman. One can be property, the other cannot.

Now, this novelette is erotica. It is aimed at adults. People are entitled to be turned on by whatever works. I just worry sometimes that we don’t think through what is turning us on and realize the problems and issues. If you realize something is problematic, but take guilty pleasure in it on an idea level upon which you wouldn’t act, that is one thing. But do we realize these things are problematic? Do we realize that saying “I belong to you” is acting like cattle? Or are we buying into media-produced ideas of romanticism that are potentially damaging?

I am not turned on by being treated like property; I want to be treated like a human. Am I just being harsh on this idea because it doesn’t turn me on, personally?

I don’t know. Feel free to comment on this idea below!


6 thoughts on “Ownership, Rich Kids, & Word Counts

    walker4long said:
    June 23, 2015 at 1:37 pm

    A lot of things in erotica are problematic when looked at realistically. Perhaps people enjoy reading about things they can’t actually experience?

    Liked by 1 person

      bambiquim responded:
      June 23, 2015 at 5:57 pm

      You’re absolutely right – a lot of things in erotica and in romance novels are problematic when looked at realistically. Like, someone once pointed out to me that Pride and Prejudice‘s famous Mr. Darcy changes b/c Elizabeth is awesome and he is in love with her, which could lead girls & women to feel like, “If I’m special enough and he really loves me, he’ll change” and put up with things they shouldn’t as a result. I had never thought of the book in that light. An ardent Austen fan, I still love Pride and Prejudice, but it helped me realize that relationships, in general, tend to be problematic, and thus, so are the stories about them.

      I think a lot of people read to escape and have new experiences. I guess my question is not whether problems exist, but whether people recognize them. Enjoying Twilight is fine; desperately wishing some guy who’s 90 years older than you breaks into your house to hover over your bed and watch you while you sleep is problematic. Similarly, enjoying a smutty story is fine, but desperately wanting someone else to own you seems problematic. Is the problematic nature of this novella general knowledge, so that readers who enjoy it do so despite the problem? Or is it ignored or not something that would generally be noticed?

      What do you think?

      Liked by 1 person

        walker4long said:
        June 23, 2015 at 7:11 pm

        It’s a good question. Most people, I think, are aware that certain behaviors just don’t work in Real Life. They enjoy the story, but understand they would not enjoy living it. However, there probably are some readers who have unhealthy attitudes about relationships and sexuality. Stories like this don’t necessarily create those attitudes, but they can affirm them.

        Liked by 1 person

        bambiquim responded:
        June 23, 2015 at 7:14 pm

        Excellent points. Thank you so much for discussing this topic with me. That last sentence, in particular, really resonates with me. 🙂


    Book Review: This Time, Baby « Bambi Quim said:
    June 25, 2015 at 1:59 am

    […] with younger/less experienced women stories, there is the concept of ownership I discussed in my last post, which often extends into the realm of childbirth. “You are going to have my baby” type […]


    […] incestual relationships in which the woman needs to be “protected.” Those fetishes are not mine, so this story did not exactly suit me, but it’s definitely not a terrible story, and if […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s